Here you can identify your weird stamps and at the same time help other people out



#451
A Soviet stamp with CCCP obliterated. Though it doesn't show up well in reproduction, this stamp has an overprint, PIBHe. What could it be?

Posted by Ian Young on 28 Jul 00

ANSWERS:

Ukraine, bogus issue, with overprint of the town name Rivne (Rovno in russian).
Rolf Kirchberg (12 Sep 00)



#452
I have several of these with different designs and similar inscriptions. Locals or private issues?

Posted by Ian Young on 28 Jul 00

ANSWERS:

Ukraine, again a bogus local stamp, in the design of the carpatho-Ukraine issue of 1945. Many of these sets were printed after the new independence by Mafia people.
Rolf Kirchberg (12 Sep 00)



#453
This Austrohungarian stamp is not in Yvert or in SG. Not under Bosnia either. Does anyone have a clue? In both catalogs, the 1K value is simply skipped.

Posted by Casper Boks on 14 Sep 00

ANSWERS:

Billig's Philatelic Handbook (Volume I, 2nd Edition, page 78) identifies a 1k olive bistre on blue as the last of a set of 14 stamp values ranging from 1h to 1k that was issued in 1919 as both perf 12 1/2 and imperf. As of the publication date of this volume (1944), the 1k stamp was valued at $1 mint. Billig's also states that "due to the end of the World War, the above set was never placed in use. It was sold, however, at the Vienna Post Office for a few days."
Mark Eiler (18 Sep 00)

This stamp belongs to a non-issued set from the Austrian-Hungarian Fieldpost 1918. It is listed in MICHEL under "K.u.K.-Feldpost - Allgemeine Ausgaben". Value is 0,50 DM.
Manuel Praest (18 Sep 00)

Stamp #453 is listed in Michel and Netto as the high value of an unissued 1918 Feldpost set. Michel No XIV. It's a set of 14 stamps where only the 1K stamp has your design. 1998 Cat Value is 50 pf. Great site by the way!
Aaron Maizlish (18 Sep 00)

This military post stamp was printed but not issued, due to the breakdown of the Austrian-Hungarian Front in 1918. 13 stamps in another design with Kaiser Karl and his Queen were also printed by not issued. The stamps found their way to the philatelic market unused. Some are rare, but other, like the 1 K are common. They are all mentioned in my Danish AFA catalogue and my old German SENF catalogue
Tron Soot-Ryen (18 Sep 00)



#454
Really have no idea, these were anounced to me as French proofs... any idea?

Posted by Henk Wallays on 14 Sep 00

ANSWERS:

If you bought these as proofs, then you'll be disappointed. Although the originals of these were issued in 1896 as commemorative labels for the visit of Tsar Nicholas II to France, there are plenty of "reprints" around. The originals were issued in nine different colours, grey violet, violet, blue, green, pale green, yellow, red, reddish brown and brown. Other types of label were issued at the same time between 5th and 8th October, 1896.
David Stirling (05 Feb 01)



#455
Fiume: a private issue?

Posted by Theo Stoevenbelt on 19 Sep 00

ANSWERS:

I live in Rijeka (formerly known as Fiume), and I am interested in all kind of Fiume stamps, but I have never seen something like this! It is my opinion that this is some kind of fantasy issue, maybe by some Italian refugee who left town after World war 2. But most of all it is interesting that that position of buildings DO NOT EXIST in Fiume and never did! The tower shown on stamp is supposed to be the main city tower-watch but obiously whoever made that stamp has not ever been in Rijeka (Fiume)!
Goran Crvelin (18 Dec 00)



#456
Where is this stamp from, Turkey? Is it a postage stamp?

Posted by Theo Stoevenbelt on 19 Sep 00

ANSWERS:

This stamp is a Turkish revenue stamp for revenues on public wells or fountains from the town of Kioztepe. It's mentioned in the McDonald catalogue for Revenues of Ottoman and Republic of Turkey.
Leo Bakx (27 Sep 00)

This is a Turkish (Ottoman) Constantinople Municipal Water Tax stamp, 1876 to pay for maintaining the Roman aqueducts. It is in three languages: Turkish written in both English and Arabic alphabets, Armenian and Greek. It identifies the quarter that the stamp was for. I have two from two different quarters. Yours is from a third, the Kjoztepe Quarter of Constantinople.
Paul Luchter (27 Sep 00)



#457
Georgie: 27-01-1920. Unknown overprint?

Posted by Theo Stoevenbelt on 19 Sep 00

ANSWERS:

This overprint is bogus, but very rare. It exists on all values of this set, perforated and imperforated, and also exists inverted. It purports to be an "Independence" issue but the date is wrong. I seem to remember it being mentioned by my late friend, Harry Rooke, in his articles on Phantom Stamps in the PHILATELIST.
David M. Stirling (11 Jan 01)



#458
Stadt Post Amt Bremen; is this a stamp?

Posted by Theo Stoevenbelt on 19 Sep 00

ANSWERS:

#458 - This is a postal stationery cut square, issued in 1853 - BEFORE Bremen issued postage stamps. It would appear to have a Thurn & Taxis cancel.
Jay T. Carrigan (04 Dec 00)

Cut-out from envelopes of the Bremen Local Post, issued in some varieties between 1853 and 1867. Listed in Michel Ganzsachen-Katalog Deutschlands 1999, page 53.
Rolf Kirchberg (13 Dec 00)



#459
The overprint reads "Kastellorizon": private overprint for Castelrosso?

Posted by Theo Stoevenbelt on 19 Sep 00

ANSWERS:

You are correct. Reverted to Italy about 1922. Back to Greece after WW2. (March 1948)
Kastellorizon, the easternmost of the Greek islands within the Dodecanese islands and is found only approximately 3 miles from the Turkish coast, near the small town Kas.
Above the port is the Castello Rosso, (Red Castle) Built by the Knights of Rhodes, and from which also the name Kastellorizon is derived. The basic stamp is Greece SG 150.
Blair Stannard (13 Mar 2003)



#460
Private overprint Kuriersko Poliswa Poszte? Any info on this one?

Posted by Theo Stoevenbelt on 19 Sep 00

 

A second opinion? Try
Banner 10000002banner

[ Stamp Galleries ] [ Cinderella Galleries ] [ Help ] [ FAQ ]

[ Back to Main Page ] [ Questions 1 - 10 ] [ Questions 11 - 20 ] [ Questions 21 - 30 ]
[ Questions 31 - 40 ] [ Questions 41 - 50 ] [ Questions 51 - 60 ][ Questions 61 - 70 ]
[ Questions 71 - 80 ] [ Questions 81 - 90 ] [ Questions 91 - 100 ] [ Questions 101 - 110 ]
[ Questions 111 - 120 ] [ Questions 121 - 130 ] [ Questions 131 - 140 ] [ Questions 141 - 150 ]
[ Questions 151 - 160 ] [ Questions 161 - 170 ] [ Questions 171 - 180 ] [ Questions 181 - 190 ]
[ Questions 191 - 200 ] [ Questions 201 - 210 ] [ Questions 211 - 220 ] [ Questions 221 - 230 ]
[ Questions 231 - 240 ] [ Questions 241 - 260 ] [ Questions 261 - 270 ] [ Questions 271 - 280 ]
[ Questions 281 - 290 ] [ Questions 291 - 300 ] [ Questions 301 - 310 ] [ Questions 311 - 320 ]
[ Questions 321 - 330 ] [ Questions 331 - 340 ] [ Questions 341 - 350 ] [ Questions 351 - 360 ]
[ Questions 361 - 370 ] [ Questions 371 - 380 ] [ Questions 381 - 390 ] [ Questions 391 - 400 ]
[ Questions 401 - 410 ] [ Questions 411 - 420 ] [ Questions 421 - 430 ] [ Questions 431 - 440 ]
[ Questions 441 - 450 ] [ Questions 451 - 460 ] [ Questions 461 - 470 ] [ Questions 471 - 480 ]
[ Questions 481 - 490 ] [ Questions 491 - 500 ] [ Questions 501 - 510 ] [ Questions 511 - 520 ]

If you have similar questions you may join us by sending a scan of your unknown stamp to our e-mail addresses

You can reach us by e-mail at: s.adinolfi@raster.it
and c.b.boks@io.tudelft.nl

© Stefano Adinolfi & Casper Boks 1997-2001