Here you can identify your weird stamps and at the same time help other people out



#101
I can't find this stamp anywhere.

Posted by Casper on 05/05/98

ANSWERS:

#101. The design and printing quality look like Taiwan circa 1950 but nothing in my catalogue looks remotely like it.
Dave Joll

#101 is a chinese stamp... that's all I know
Donald Olivan

#101 is unlikely to be a postage stamp. Neither country nor values were printed. The chinese characters are not sharply in focus. It appears to identify some clan or association.
Andrew Lau (18 Oct 99)

No. 101 is not a stamp, and most probably it is a medicine label. On the top read, "Shendetang of Daixin Street", and the lower strip read, "Portrait of He Ranzhao". This confirms the design of old Chinese drug packing design in the Republic (and some till now) of printing the establisher's portrait and the usage of banknote designs to prevent fakes.
Samuel Curtis (11 Oct 01)



#102
Is this stamp catalogued somewhere? I haven't been able to find it in my Yvert & Tellier.

Posted by Stefano on 06/05/98

ANSWERS:

#102. Almost certainly a fake, and a crude one at that. Hong Kong never used British stamps overprinted.
Dave Joll



#103
I don't have a clue what this is, but it is no postage stamp, that is for sure. If it did not have a cancellation I would not have posted it...

Posted by Casper on 06/05/98

ANSWERS:

No. 103 is the top half of a 1956 Belgian revenue.
Jay T. Carrigan

It looks in many aspects (design, printing style, denomination, cancellation, number) very similar to some stamps I have. They are from Belgium and are so called 'taxes fiscales - fiscale taxen'. The stamps I have are twice the size, in that case this is possibly only the top-half of the stamp (mine are rouletted in between). I have cancellation-dates from 1929 till 1949. No catalogue-information unfortunately.
Maarten Willems

#103 This is the upper half of a Belgium documentary revenue stamp. There exist about twenty different very extensive series. Listed in the Barefoot catalogue on Benelux revenues.
Jan Wessels (13 Apr 2000)



#104
Does anybody know the story behind these stamps. I know they are completely bogus, but what organisation printed these? (I also have an orange 10 cents and a blue 50 cents)

Posted by Casper on 06/05/98

ANSWERS:

#104. Probably from South Africa commemorating something to do with the Orange Free State. Unfortunately I don't know anything about these labels.
Dave Joll

I believe this Oranje Vrijstaat was an "invention" of Provo, the playful Dutch student protest movement at the end of the 60s. One of the leaders was Roel van Duin, who even can be recognized (with a bit of imagination) on the stamps.
Maarten Willems

It is a local private Dutch post stamp of Amsterdam. It is listed in Dutch local catalogue by "Studiegroep Particuliere Postbezorging". On 10th June 1970 were issued 4 stamps with face value of 10c, 15c, 25c, 50c with the same design as the one shown.
Fabio Vaccarezza (15 May 2000)



#105
Click to see this sheet bigger
I cannot find this souvenir sheet in Scott. I assume that it is one of the local issues. I would appreciate information on its origin and value if anybody can find a catalogue listing. Thank you!

Posted by Derrick Grose on 26/05/98

ANSWERS:

I found your spanish sheet listed in my danish 1982 AFA Vesteuropa Frimaerkekatalog under the category "Postvaesenets Velgorenhedsmaerker" which is to say "charity stamps" in favour of mail workers. It was issued in 1937 by the spanish republic. I found a twin issue by Spanish Morocco in my Yvert et Tellier, its legend specifies that they were issued in order to help orphans of the mail workers. Your sheet is listed as #35 and has a value of 140 Dkr both mint and used (a danish crown is equivalent to roughly 300 italian Lire, a US dollar is about 1700 Lire, that means your sheet was about 25 US$, in 1982). The same sheet, with no perforation (#35a) is given at 2500 Dkr, while in green colour (#36) its value is even higher.
Stefano



#106
This might be page-material. I cannot find it in the Yvert catalogue. I guess it is some kind of seal. Ever seen it? I wonder if the "25" has to do with a 25-year anniversary or with value... probably the first.

Posted by Casper on 05/06/98

ANSWERS:

My guess is that it's a label. Anyway the cancel is danish (Husk postnummer! - Remember the postcode!)
Stefano

I think this is a UNESCO seal which happens to have been used in Denmark. The '25' is likely to be the 25th anniversary of UNESCO.
Andrew Riddell

This is a UNESCO gift stamp and are issued to raise funds for less developed parts of the world, The proceeds from their sale are exchanged for Gift Coupons which are issued by UNESCO and which may be redeemed in any country by the school, hospital, library, laboratory, or similar institution to which help has been allocated by the Gift Coupon Fund. They have been sold and denominated by many countries: US, France, UK, Sweden, Denmark, Japan, Australia. The ones that I have seen were dated between 1951 and 1961.
Clyde S. Thomas



#107
Does anyone know if this is a bogus russian issue or an official one?

Posted by Casper on 05/06/98

ANSWERS:

No. 107 was (I think) at one time listed in Michel, but it does not appear in the latest edition. I have read somewhere that the Sankt Petersburg issue is considered legitimate.
Jay T. Carrigan



#108a-b
I always classified these as "normal" Mexican stamps as found in the catalogues. But now that we have this great page, I hoped that someone could tell something about the Vera Cruz and Guadalajara overprints. I could not find them mentioned in the catalogues I checked.

Posted by Casper on 05/06/98

ANSWERS:

These look like Scott #82/94 (12˘ blue) and #83/95 (25˘ red?) and there is a note that they are overprinted with "District Name, Number and abbreviated date". With a PAPEL SELLADO watermark they catalogue US$ 30 and US$ 24 respectively. Unwatermarked they catalogue US$ 1.65 and US$ 2 respectively. There are also several varieties of paper with varying values. I hope you find watermarks!
Derrick Grose

This question about overprints on early Mexican stamps is exactly the kind of thing that makes Mexican philately so interesting - there are literally hundreds of district overprints on the issues up to 1884. Some are exceedingly rare (unfortunately, not the ones showed).
The following is from Nicholas Follansbee's "Catalogue of the Stamps of Mexico 1856 - 1900":

THE DISTRICT OVERPRINTS

Mexico was divided into numerous postal districts, each with a main post office known as an administración. The administratively dependent post offices are called "sub-offices." Stamps were produced in Mexico City and issued to the various administraciones in batches known as consignments, and careful records of the quantities issued in these consignments were kept, as was an accurate accounting of their subsequent distribution to the sub-offices, sales and returns. These administrative structures and procedures were not at all unusual in themselves but are rarely reflected in a country's stamps. However, during much of the 19th century, Mexico was an unstable country, and the postal system was prone to disruption by bandits and anti-government factions. The overprinting of stamps with district names and/or numbers was an unusual but effective measure taken to counter some of these difficulties.
The issues of 1856 and 1861 were distributed to the administraciones without overprints, but upon arrival and before being distributed to the sub-offices or sold to the public, they were handstamped with the district name (though some of the smaller districts did not follow this practice, and there were occasional instances where stamps were used without overprint from even some of the larger districts). Some districts used very few stamps; examples today are either rare or, in some cases, entirely unknown. Stamps from the "rare" districts are eagerly sought by collectors and worth far more than those from the "common" ones.
The Eagle and Maximilian Issues were distributed to the administraciones overprinted with the consignment number and year. Upon arrival, these were usually overprinted with the district name as well. Sub-consignments were sent from the administración to sub-offices, often with a handstamped number added and in some instances, the name of the sub-office was applied instead of the district name (AGUASCALIENTES, COCULA, TEPIC, and ZAPOTLAN are "subs" rather than district overprints).
Starting in 1868, stamps were issued to the districts overprinted with a number corresponding to the district in addition to numbers indicating the year. Upon arrival at the district administración they were additionally overprinted with the district name. The practice was generally discontinued in 1884.
Kris Haggblom (19 Jan 2001)



#109
Help me to find out about this stamp. Thanks!

Posted by Jeroen on 05/06/98

ANSWERS:

This stamp (#109) is a Russian semi-postal for Volga Famine relief. It was issued in February 1922 and is listed in Scott as B21. Its 1998 price was US$ 0.30.
Derrick Grose



#110
These are stamps I bought, but I do not remember from what region they were. Stupid, huh? Do you know?

Posted by Casper on 05/06/98

ANSWERS:

No. 110 is one of the 1921 Wrangel Army issues, listed in Scott under Offices in the Turkish Empire.
Jay T. Carrigan

Russia 76 (image A15, Scott) overprinted to make R. Off. in Turk Emp 239.
Terry J. Reedy


A very useful reference book:

[ Stamp Galleries ] [ Cinderella Galleries ] [ Help ] [ FAQ ]

[ Back to Main Page ] [ Questions 1 - 10 ] [ Questions 11 - 20 ] [ Questions 21 - 30 ]
[ Questions 31 - 40 ] [ Questions 41 - 50 ] [ Questions 51 - 60 ] [ Questions 61 - 70 ]
[ Questions 71 - 80 ] [ Questions 81 - 90 ] [ Questions 91 - 100 ] [ Questions 101 - 110 ]
[ Questions 111 - 120 ] [ Questions 121 - 130 ] [ Questions 131 - 140 ] [ Questions 141 - 150 ]
[ Questions 151 - 160 ] [ Questions 161 - 170 ] [ Questions 171 - 180 ] [ Questions 181 - 190 ]
[ Questions 191 - 200 ] [ Questions 201 - 210 ] [ Questions 211 - 220 ] [ Questions 221 - 230 ]
[ Questions 231 - 240 ] [ Questions 241 - 260 ] [ Questions 261 - 270 ] [ Questions 271 - 280 ]
[ Questions 281 - 290 ] [ Questions 291 - 300 ] [ Questions 301 - 310 ] [ Questions 311 - 320 ]
[ Questions 321 - 330 ] [ Questions 331 - 340 ] [ Questions 341 - 350 ] [ Questions 351 - 360 ]
[ Questions 361 - 370 ] [ Questions 371 - 380 ] [ Questions 381 - 390 ] [ Questions 391 - 400 ]
[ Questions 401 - 410 ] [ Questions 411 - 420 ] [ Questions 421 - 430 ] [ Questions 431 - 440 ]
[ Questions 441 - 450 ] [ Questions 451 - 460 ] [ Questions 461 - 470 ] [ Questions 471 - 480 ]
[ Questions 481 - 490 ] [ Questions 491 - 500 ] [ Questions 501 - 510 ] [ Questions 511 - 520 ]

If you have similar questions you may join us by sending a scan of your unknown stamp to our e-mail addresses

You can reach us by e-mail at: s.adinolfi@raster.it
and c.b.boks@io.tudelft.nl

© Stefano Adinolfi & Casper Boks 1997-2001